40 years all round, what a result!
14,610 days inside minimum, each one being a stamped out clone of the previous and the next. With only the prospect of being stabbed, slashed or covered in boiling water by a patriotic inmate to liven things up. Good.
I can't even begin to imagine spending 40 years inside like that, if I had to , then I would kill myself. Such a long sentence seems much better that the morons who wrote into the Sun praising the death penalty for people like this. The irony of the fact that their plans revolved round them dying in the first place, making death not much of a deterrent, was kind of lost on them, I think.
The longer they sit while their brains rot, the better.
(the buffoon bombers, that is, anyone who proposes the death penalty as a deterrent for suicide bombers has clearly already achieved this)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
More endless whinging about the Police Service, from one more worker at the coalface. Recently changed from another blog, due to a little chat at HQ. I'll add a page counter set to what my old one was when I get the chance.
My Fave Blogs
hits
Blog Archive
About Me
- The Blue Pimpernel
- In my 30's, married, 2 kids, one dog, back up to three cats (the dirty little stopout came back after a week AWOL, then promptly went out and ate a bird) and now back down to one gerbil, thanks to one of the cats.
6 comments:
If their lawyer gets her way, maybe it wont be so tough for them.
Yes, sometimes the punisment does fit the crime.
I wonder whether to bring back the death penalty but as you say, isn't better that they will suffer for so many years!
The only problem is that we have seen all this before. In several years time after countless appeals because the system allows it there is likely to be some high-profile misplaced intention on exploiting the fact that someone looked a bit odd at them and they never had a fair trial, were subject to some form of bad treatment or intimidation, had delusions or some other pathetic excuse. The get them out bandwagon will be greasing its wheels ready to roll, appeal, reduction, release. Soft on crime, Tough on the Fighters of Crime.
In relation to the above, I must apologise as I think I have unintenionally provided the unfair trial, you see I think I farted sometime in 1997.
Sorry again.
Subject: Help requested
Hi
I work for a small national kids charity: web site: www.fairplayforchildren.org
We've been active in child protection over some years, and we are increasingly concerned at people such as the 'spiked' set up who run down CRB and the new Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act.
Their line is that so much checking is over-reaction, nanny state etc. Our view is that such checks help protect kids by helping to weed out those that are known.
We cite the case of David Lawrence, known to the Avon and Somerset force, who was a junior soccer ref and coach and known to them over many years for a string of complaints etc. Eventually in the late 90s he was finally prosecuted, 12 specimen charges, 3 withdrawn, convicted on nine, came out of jail November 2002 and by March 2003 in another junior league which was not accessing CRB checks at that time. (We came across him as we took part in a Home Office pilot which undertook police checks for voluntary groups - VOCS - so we were asked by the first league to run check on him in 1997 along with 49 other ref/coaches and he came up as 'soft intel' so the league removed him from access a full 18 months before he was finally arrested after years of police concern, which they had until VOCS been unable to share.)
My query is this. Serial paedophiles like Lawrence operate over many years - in fact he was put away again for further offences which came to light, from the Isle of Man in 1975, so he was active over 22 years at least. Lawrence was charged with 12, sentenced for 9. But what I am asking is, does anyone have any idea how many kids such people may involve and abuse. I would hazard an educated guess that Lawrence abused FAR more than have ever come to light. Those who saw the C4 doc 'Chosen' recently may see how and why this happens, a very brave set of people to tell it now.
I will guarantee that no names or towns/forces will be revealed, and if anyone wants to send a 'blind' email which I cannot trace, fine. I don't want names of offenders but "X was convicted for 7 but we are sure he involved at least ... number of kids over xxx years"
The end result - an article to be released to counter these idiots.
ANY help, including passing this mail on, very welcome.
Thanks
Jan Cosgrove [mr]
National Secretary
Hi,
We are teaming up with Blauer.com for a giveaway! Blauer is the leading provider for Police And we wanted to see if you would be interested in blogging about an experience that you might have had using a Blauer product. If you have not, that's okay too! You could also write about a product that you are interested in using. We are doing an Blauer Bag Giveaway with lots of great stuff!
If you are interested please a post about your experience/write about a product that you're dying to try~!
To Qualify the Requirements are:
1. 300-500 words
2. 1 link to the main webpage (www.Blauer.com)
3. 1 link to the product that you have used or would like to try out (http://www.blauer.com/law-enforcement/outerwear/high-visibility-outerwear.html)
4. This much be 100% duplicate free
When you have posted this article, please email ThuyVy@submitdigital.com and provide her with the URL so that she can enter you.
This giveaway will start Wednesday July, 11th and the winning blogger will be selected on August 31, 2012. We will enter in the URLs and randomly choose a winner. The winner will be contacted via E-mail no later than September 14, 2012. When you are contacted she will ask your for your info as to where to mail the Blauer Bag giveaway!
We wish you the best of luck!!
Brandon Murphy
Post a Comment